Should we prevent colorectal cancer?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
“How should we treat older patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, A Review”
Nearly 50 % of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer, affect people over 70 years of age. Inclusion of older patients in clinical trials has been extremely rare. As a result, there is debate on how to manage these patients because it is still unclear how to balance the therapeutic advantages and toxicities. For patients who do not have comorbid conditions, with performance status (P.S.) 0–1, treatm...
متن کاملGlycemic variability: should we and can we prevent it?
Diabetes is characterized by glycemic disorders that include both sustained chronic hyperglycemia and acute glucose fluctuations. There is now cogent evidence for the deleterious effects of sustained chronic hyperglycemia that results in excessive protein glycation and generation of oxidative stress. The role of glucose variability from peaks to nadirs is less documented, but there are many rea...
متن کاملCan we prevent prostate cancer?
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men. It is common in Australia, New Zealand, North America and North West Europe, but rare in Asia, Africa and South America. OBJECTIVE This article reviews the role of chemopreventive agents for prostate cancer. The available evidence strongly suggests that dietary changes and supplementation with a variety of micr...
متن کاملCan Dietary and Pharmacological Supplements Prevent Colorectal Cancer ? COLORECTAL CANCER
14 For some time, there has been an effort made to identify and evaluate dietary components and chemical compounds (chemopreventive agents) that could prevent, inhibit or change the course of colorectal (CR) carcinogenesis (1). These efforts were based on clinical and lay observations, beliefs and epidemiological correlations, that certain foods or additives had beneficial anti-carcinogenic pro...
متن کاملShould we prevent non-therapeutic mutilation and extreme body modification?
In this paper, I discuss several arguments against non-therapeutic mutilation. Interventions into bodily integrity, which do not serve a therapeutic purpose and are not regarded as aesthetically acceptable by the majority, e.g. tongue splitting, branding and flesh stapling, are now practised, but, however, are still seen as a kind of 'aberration' that ought not to be allowed. I reject several a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas
سال: 2011
ISSN: 1130-0108
DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082011001000001